Corridor

Your agent ships the app. Then it sits on your laptop.

Corridor takes what your coding agent just built, proves it actually works, puts it online, and gives the people you name a door they can open. No Kubernetes, no YAML, no platform engineer.

Under a minute, captioned. Sound is optional.

The gap

Building stopped being the hard part.

An afternoon with an agent gets you a working internal tool. Then it stops, because the next step needs skills the person who asked for it does not have.

It runs on one laptop

The tool works. It works for exactly one person, and only while their machine is awake.

Nobody can check it

The agent wrote it. Whether it has health checks, whether its secrets are hardcoded, whether it even builds, nobody on the team can say.

Sharing means a ticket

Getting two colleagues access turns into a week, a cloud account, and someone who knows what an ingress is.

How it works

One path, from your agent to their browser.

You say it out loud

In the coding agent you already use: host this at rota.acme.com. Corridor takes it from there.

It refuses to ship a broken thing

Before a single file is committed, Corridor proves the image exists, the config renders, and the release is versioned. If any of that fails, nothing deploys and you get told why.

It goes online, on infrastructure you control

Your cloud account or your own cluster. Real HTTPS, a real subdomain, versioned releases you can roll back.

You name who gets in

Type their email. They sign in and open it, like a shared document. Every entry is logged against a person, not a shared password.

Your agent builds Corridor checks first passes Live URL tool.yourco.com opens people you named refused nothing ships
Work that fails a check never reaches a URL. That branch is the product; everything else is plumbing you already have.

The difference

Every other tool makes deploying easy. That was never the risk.

When a person wrote the code, they knew whether it was right. When an agent writes it, shipping is trivial and correctness is the hard part. So Corridor checks first and refuses out loud.

Checked before anything is committed

PROVED
The registry can pull this exact image tag
GET /v2/<owner>/<image>/tags/list → 200
PROVED
The configuration actually renders
kubectl kustomize components/<app>/
REFUSED
A pipeline that publishes images but cuts no version
gh release list → (empty)
REFUSED
A repo with no Dockerfile, and no local build to paper over it
stop · do not guess

The alternative is finding out from ImagePullBackOff five minutes after the push, on infrastructure nobody on the team owns.

Where Corridor actually is

Early, and specific about it.

You are looking at an ad for something being built in the open. Here is the honest state, because you will find out in the first ten minutes anyway.

Working today

  • [✓]Agent to live URL, running in production on a real cluster
  • [✓]Pre-flight proofs and refusals, exactly as shown above
  • [✓]Versioned releases with automatic semantic versioning
  • [✓]Managed Postgres with automated backups and point-in-time recovery

Not there yet

  • [  ]Self-serve signup. Onboarding is a conversation right now
  • [  ]Access controls for naming who opens what, in build
  • [  ]Compliance paperwork. No SOC 2. If you need one, Corridor is too early for you

Early access

If something your team built is stuck on a laptop, I want to hear about it.

Early access is small and hands-on. You get set up personally, and the roadmap is shaped by what breaks for you.

Ready to talk now? Book 15 minutes instead.